"Why the big boys won't come back" - Fortune says majors doomed

cointyro

New Member
\"Why the big boys won\'t come back\" - Fortune says majors doomed

I found this article very interesting and thought you guys might be interested too.

*************************

Airlines: Why the Big Boys Won't Come Back

FOR THE NATION'S BELEAGUERED AIRLINE INDUSTRY, THE TIPPING POINT IS FINALLY HERE: THE DISCOUNTERS ARE WINNING.

Ask Dave Ulmer, chief of planning at JetBlue, about his industry and he can hardly contain his glee. To him, the towering fares charged by the major U.S. airlines are a gilt-edged invitation to make tons of money. As we speak, he's loading up on 100-seat Embraers--planes that are the perfect size to compete in the majors' regional markets. "We'll fly routes like JFK to Charlotte, Norfolk, and other East Coast cities where the average [one-way] fares are over $200," he says. "We could easily cut those fares to one-third, or around $70!"

For the six major airlines that date from pre-deregulation days-- American, United, Delta, Continental, Northwest, and US Airways-- that's a terrifying prospect. And it should be. While discounters have been nibbling away at the big guys for years, now the industry is at a crucial point. For the first time ever, the pricing pressure exerted by the discounters--which now have close to a quarter of the domestic air travel market--has become so severe that the majors can't raise prices significantly during a boom. On top of that add higher oil prices; a burgeoning threat from small regional carriers, some of which may take on their old major airline partners; and growing resistance in Washington to solving the industry's problems through bailouts.

The conclusion? Domestically, the majors are on a permanent path to decline. They will continue to shrink in the U.S. while maintaining their lucrative international routes. The only thing that can change this grim picture: If the big airline unions get religion and grant pay cuts so steep that the majors can compete head-to-head on costs with the discounters--an extremely unlikely scenario. "The long war will be lost, barring radical changes in the way these companies do business," says highly regarded airline analyst David Strine of Bear Stearns in a recent report.

Meanwhile, the skies are buzzing with robust airlines waiting to take their place. JetBlue, AirTran, America West, and Frontier are attacking the old-timers' most profitable, protected routes. Of the top 1,000 "city pairs" in the U.S.--New York to Houston, or Miami to Cincinnati, for example--the majors faced low-fare competition on just over half four years ago, says Darin Lee of LECG, a consulting firm in Cambridge, Mass. Now they tangle with discounters on 80% of those routes. That means that the majors simply can't raise prices to refill their coffers during the current economic recovery--as they did in every previous boom. "The low-cost carriers are now dictating pricing in our business," admits C. David Cush, the chief of sales at American Airlines. Says Bear Stearns's Strine: "Every time the majors match the fares of the discounters, they lose money. That situation is clearly unsustainable."

The recent spike in oil prices is making life even more difficult. Jet fuel accounts for 10% to 15% of the majors' operating costs, and every 1-cent-per-gallon increase drives up expenses by $180 million. (No one, not even the discounters, has succeeded in raising prices to cover the extra fuel bills.) It's no wonder the Big Six are on track to lose $5 billion this year; if oil prices stay at $40 a barrel, that figure will jump to over $6 billion. Those losses have saddled the majors with $41 billion in debt and a negative $3.2 billion in equity. By contrast, in the first quarter, Southwest, JetBlue, and AirTran earned a total of $45 million, and all posted strong increases in revenue. Wall Street has noticed: The market capitalization of the six biggest discounters, including America West, ATA, and Frontier, now dwarfs that of the six majors, $18 billion to $4 billion.

To be sure, the major airlines have come back from trouble before. That's because until recently they could rely on three things to protect themselves from low-cost competitors. They controlled most of the landing slots at half-a-dozen crowded airports such as New York's LaGuardia, Chicago's O'Hare, and Washington National. They maintained "fortress" hubs in which a Northwest or US Air controlled as much as 80% of the traffic. And they were just about the only game in town for transporting passengers on long-haul, coast-to-coast routes and from midsized cities to their big hubs.

But starting in the late '90s, the Department of Transportation and local governments pushed airports to give more gates to newcomers, helping Frontier, Spirit, and AirTran establish a presence at Washington National and JetBlue fly from New York's JFK. The fortress hubs are crumbling too. While they still exist in some spots--Northwest totally dominates Detroit, for instance--in May both Southwest and Frontier invaded Philadelphia, a longtime bulwark for US Airways, hammering away at US Airways' fares to dozens of destinations, from Tampa to Las Vegas.

In coast-to-coast markets the discounters have made major inroads as well. JetBlue challenges American and United with increasingly frequent flights from JFK to the West Coast; since it arrived in 2000, those fares have dropped around 30%. Late last year, America West, a former major that reinvented itself as a discounter, started rolling out extensive West Coast service from both New York's JFK and Boston's Logan--including the Boston-to-San Francisco route dominated by United and American. (United was forced to match America West's three-day advance-purchase fare of $205 one way; its old fare was a breathtaking $1,166.) The battle extends to a host of routes between large cities. On June 20, Frontier will break United's monopoly on nonstop service from Nashville to Denver by offering two flights a day between those cities. Frontier will charge $199 for a three-day advance purchase one-way ticket; United charges $464, but it says it will match Frontier's fares.

Price isn't the discounters' only advantage. Back in the day, bad service was the tradeoff for low prices. No more. Now these airlines offer new planes, big smiles, and assigned seating. And discounters like JetBlue and Frontier provide every passenger with a seat-back monitor showing live TV and sometimes movies. AirTran, America West, and Spirit even offer business-class cabins just as plush as those of the old-line carriers.

The only routes the majors still fully dominate--and where they continue to extract premium fares--are those linking small and medium-sized cities to their hubs. For years big airlines have been using regional carriers to fly passengers from the smaller cities to those hubs. These airlines, which include Mesa, Chautauqua, and SkyWest, are separate companies. But they fly under the names of the airlines they serve, which sell the tickets and set the schedules. These regionals generally operate jets with between 30 and 70 seats. "The reason the majors use regional airlines is that under their union rules they can usually outsource flights only to planes that carry 70 passengers or fewer," says JetBlue's Ulmer. Because the regionals have far lower labor costs, the small-city business is quite lucrative for the majors, each of which face virtually no discount competition between the smaller city and its hub.

But now--you guessed it--the discounters are massing to offer competing nonstop service to those cities. Some regional airlines that now serve the big boys are itching to break free and join them. One former regional, Atlantic Coast Airlines, has reinvented itself as the appropriately named Independence Air. Starting this summer, it will fly hundreds of daily flights from Washington Dulles, a United hub, to places like Portland, Maine, Syracuse, N.Y., and Norfolk. Those routes from Washington are dominated by United and US Airways. Meanwhile, Jonathan Ornstein, CEO of Mesa, one of US Airways' regional carriers, may move into Pittsburgh now that US Air is cutting back there. "We're studying the opportunity of forming an ultra-low-cost carrier," he says. "We believe we could achieve costs lower than those of the existing discounters."

In addition, the discounters' low fares will attract new customers who wouldn't pay the higher prices charged by the majors. The result: Even more discounters will flock to the medium-sized markets. Southwest CFO Gary Kelly says that Southwest, which now uses only 737s, finds the regional markets so tempting that it is studying the possibility of adding a fleet of smaller jets to provide nonstop service to small and medium-sized cities.

To fight back, the majors have been piling on additional flights, hoping to avoid ceding even more market share. Problem is, that strategy simply drives prices lower. United and Delta's new "low- fare" airlines, Ted and Song, aren't likely to help either. They sidestep some of their parents' restrictive work rules, but they come nowhere near matching the discounters' low labor costs. Not surprisingly, the majors disagree. They claim that to prosper, they don't need to match the discounters' costs, just narrow the existing gap. And they're trying hard. Delta, for example, is seeking a 30% pay cut from its pilots. "We'll never have their cost structure," says American's Cush. "But with our revenue premium, we can compete effectively."

What will become of the majors? Right now, US Airways is the shakiest (the strongest are American, Continental, and Northwest). It's highly possible that US Air will simply sell its assets: If the airline's cash position falls below $700 million (it's about $1 billion now), the U.S. government can declare it in default of its loan guarantee, possibly forcing a liquidation. United, after 18 months in bankruptcy, is now seeking a $1.6 billion federal bailout. But given US Air's problems, United probably won't get it. As for Delta, it has told the SEC it may soon file for bankruptcy.

And that may be the industry's Hail Mary pass. In the airline business there are only two ways to get big cost reductions: Use the threat of bankruptcy to push the unions, or renegotiate the union contracts in Chapter 11. Unfortunately, the cuts the majors need to compete are so deep--on the order of 30% to 40%--that their hostile unions will never grant them. Even the savings from bankruptcy have never been sufficient to put the majors on a par with the discounters.

The smart money, then, says that we will see a combination of mergers, liquidations, and, finally, a group of fewer carriers concentrating on niche markets. An industry insider predicts that only three majors will be flying in five years. They will keep their lucrative international routes, especially the well-protected ones to Asia. They will also continue to connect medium-sized cities to other medium-sized cities--that's a business that's perfectly suited to their hub-and-spoke networks.

When you think about it, this all makes complete sense. After all, the deregulation of the airline industry was designed to give consumers lots of competition and lower prices. To achieve deregulation's promise, the discounters had to win. It just took 26 years for that to happen.
 
Re: \"Why the big boys won\'t come back\" - Fortune says majors doomed

Freaking John Ornstein from Mesa....."ultra low cost airlines"

Guess he'll make Mesa an "ultra low-paying airline" too
 
Re: \"Why the big boys won\'t come back\" - Fortune says majors doomed

[ QUOTE ]
The smart money, then, says that we will see a combination of mergers, liquidations, and, finally, a group of fewer carriers concentrating on niche markets. An industry insider predicts that only three majors will be flying in five years. They will keep their lucrative international routes, especially the well-protected ones to Asia. They will also continue to connect medium-sized cities to other medium-sized cities--that's a business that's perfectly suited to their hub-and-spoke networks.

When you think about it, this all makes complete sense. After all, the deregulation of the airline industry was designed to give consumers lots of competition and lower prices. To achieve deregulation's promise, the discounters had to win. It just took 26 years for that to happen.

[/ QUOTE ]
I'm missing something here. If the industry goes in the direction of fewer carriers each carrying out their own niche markets, won't that re-regulate the industry? Won't that eventually mean ultra high ticket prices? And this was all brough on by the idea of low cost carriers? This dosn't add up.
confused.gif
 
Re: \"Why the big boys won\'t come back\" - Fortune says majors doomed

[ QUOTE ]
I'm missing something here. If the industry goes in the direction of fewer carriers each carrying out their own niche markets, won't that re-regulate the industry?

[/ QUOTE ]

How so / how do you figure?

Regulation is when a government board decides who can fly where and how much ticket prices will be. That will never return.

Fewer major carriers wouldn't mean higher prices. Flying to Europe or Asia may never be quite as cheap as taking Southwest domestically. But airfare costs within the U.S. are bound to decrease as JetBlue, AirTran, Southwest, America West, Independence Air, Frontier, etc. expand...
 
Re: \"Why the big boys won\'t come back\" - Fortune says majors doomed

I have to say, I am still to this day blown away by every flight I take on Frontier. I still refuse to lump our airline into the same category with Southwest and some of the other LCCs. It just doesn't feel like you are getting a cheaper product when you fly with F9 and the service is second to none! Night and day after flying with United. It is going to be sad when my last day at F9 comes in a few weeks.

Hopefully I have laid enough groundwork to be able to come back someday!
 
Re: \"Why the big boys won\'t come back\" - Fortune says majors doomed

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I'm missing something here. If the industry goes in the direction of fewer carriers each carrying out their own niche markets, won't that re-regulate the industry?

[/ QUOTE ]

How so / how do you figure?

Regulation is when a government board decides who can fly where and how much ticket prices will be. That will never return.


[/ QUOTE ]
There may be no governing board saying who can fly where, but if this prediction of fewer carriers serving their own niches comes to pass, we will have effectively re-regulated.

LCC's can only offer ultra low fares on so many routes. If they fly those routes the majors can't compete. The majors then will abandon those routes and stick to their international routes and domestic routes that work well with the hub and spoke system. And there may also be other niches that other types of carriers will fill. Now what happens is a survival of the fittest situation. Each carrier flies only the routes that they prosper with, given the equipment they operate and the market they serve. No need to compete with other carriers, as the other carriers are all flying different routes, serving their own niches. Limmited competition = high ticket prices.
 
Re: \"Why the big boys won\'t come back\" - Fortune says majors doomed

Glad my old flight instructor is a Captain at jetblue now. Hope he can pull some strings
 
Re: \"Why the big boys won\'t come back\" - Fortune says majors doomed

As usual, the Wall Street jokers who think they know what the bleep they are talking about have no clue.

LCCs are the ultimate in cherry pickers. You want an all LCC route system? Fine. Now tell me how the hell you're going to get people and cargo around to places that simply will not, and cannot ever support an LCC flying into there.

They simply cannot provide us with the route system that the United States needs. Period. Even the founder of Southwest said so.

Of course, take anything the jokers at Fortune say with a full shaker of salt. This is a magazine, after all, that called Enron its company of the year. And it's a magazine that told us we'd all be ordering toothpaste online and that Amazon was going to take over the world.
 
Re: \"Why the big boys won\'t come back\" - Fortune says majors doomed

The day an LCC serves Billings, MT or Chicago to Madison, WI, I may put a little attention into that article.

Heard it before back in 95.
 
Re: \"Why the big boys won\'t come back\" - Fortune says majors doomed

[ QUOTE ]
As usual, the Wall Street jokers who think they know what the bleep they are talking about have no clue.

LCCs are the ultimate in cherry pickers. You want an all LCC route system? Fine. Now tell me how the hell you're going to get people and cargo around to places that simply will not, and cannot ever support an LCC flying into there.

.

[/ QUOTE ]

We could go back to the old EAS, Essential Air Services, money; so the littlest towns can have air service. It'd be damn expensive, but that could be one thing they'd try.
 
Re: \"Why the big boys won\'t come back\" - Fortune says majors doomed

Reregulation? Bah!

Then they'd be charging $400 to fly between VIS and SFO, thus a new generation of "Why can't I fly first class from SEA to MIA for $85" brand of whiners will be born!

LCC's cherry pick routes, pure and simple and there's absolutely no way to have any sort of an international operation without a domestic route network to support it.

Didn't work for Pan Am, and it certainly wouldn't work for GoogleAir that tries to start a profitable GSO-LHR route either. The analysts always seem to conveniently leave out historical perspective.
 
Re: \"Why the big boys won\'t come back\" - Fortune says majors doomed

True, but then we have a situation where we're essentially going back to the pre-deregulation days for some places, and a deregulated market in some places.

Maybe that's what needs to be done?
 
Re: \"Why the big boys won\'t come back\" - Fortune says majors doomed

[ QUOTE ]
The day an LCC serves Billings, MT or Chicago to Madison, WI, I may put a little attention into that article.

Heard it before back in 95.

[/ QUOTE ]


ATA Connection (Chicago Express) flies to Madison from Chicago.

America West (Express) flies from Billings, MT to both PHX and LAS.

Believe it or not, the LCC's can serve many smaller communities.
 
Re: \"Why the big boys won\'t come back\" - Fortune says majors doomed

Both hub-and-spoke carriers.
 
Re: \"Why the big boys won\'t come back\" - Fortune says majors doomed

[ QUOTE ]
Both hub-and-spoke carriers.

[/ QUOTE ]

Both LCC's too.

The hub-and-spoke system can still work, you just have to know what you are doing.

A few of the ol' majors will inevitably survive, but right now there are too many high cost carriers chasing after too few high-yield customers.
 
Re: \"Why the big boys won\'t come back\" - Fortune says majors doomed

So what's your solution? Cut pilot pay?
 
Re: \"Why the big boys won\'t come back\" - Fortune says majors doomed

It's the motto of Wall Street. Cut employee pay and benefits so that everyone is working for Wal-Mart style wages! And if they balk, ship their jobs to China or Malaysia.

Oh, and give yourself a $100 million pat on the back for shafting your employees, too.

And if an exec actually shows some decency and God forbid, gives his employees benefits and pay that's above Wal-Mart, say that he's not looking out for the shareholders even if he's the biggest shareholder out there (see Costco for an example of that).

Just remember that Fortune called Enron their company of the year and called them a model to emulate.
 
Re: \"Why the big boys won\'t come back\" - Fortune says majors doomed

[ QUOTE ]
The day an LCC serves Billings, MT or Chicago to Madison, WI, I may put a little attention into that article.

Heard it before back in 95.

[/ QUOTE ]

Hey Doug,

Try Frontier from DEN to BIL. Two flights a day each way. The loads are not the greatest right now as it is one of the newer routes but they are coming along. Given, it is served by Frontier JetExpress but I think we run a 319/318 on it from time to time when the loads demand it.

I agree LCCs will not be able to take over the domestic market anytime soon but they are growing. Frontier started off serving all these routes that you guys are talking about such as Billings, Omaha, and other small cities that few fly to. There was no other way for Frontier to survive under United shadow here in Denver unless they flew to places that no one else flew to.

In the world of Low Cost Carriers Frontier is truely a "whole different animal" and very different than other airlines. It is not just some slogan we threw on the plane.
 
Re: \"Why the big boys won\'t come back\" - Fortune says majors doomed

[ QUOTE ]
Reregulation?
Didn't work for Pan Am, and it certainly wouldn't work for GoogleAir that tries to start a profitable GSO-LHR route either. The analysts always seem to conveniently leave out historical perspective.

[/ QUOTE ]

Hey!!GSO is a happening place!!! Everyone wants to come here!! We have 6 Starbucks and a PGA golf tournament every year!
 
Re: \"Why the big boys won\'t come back\" - Fortune says majors doomed

[quote}I'm missing something here. If the industry goes in the direction of fewer carriers each carrying out their own niche markets, won't that re-regulate the industry? Won't that eventually mean ultra high ticket prices? And this was all brough on by the idea of low cost carriers? This dosn't add up.
confused.gif


[/ QUOTE ]

No, it won't re-regulate the industry. The main point is that there are too many connecting hubs for any of them to be profitable. Fewer hubs, fewer hub carriers=profitability. Ticket prices will stay reasonable, because if they don't competition will immediately move in to that market.

This is not hard to understand. It's just like when 4 gas stations are built at the same intersection and you think "how can they all make it?" Then in 6 months 2 of them are shuttered and the other two continue in business. Or any other type of business you can think of. Right now ther are too many hubs for anyone to survive. When about half of them are gone the remaining ones will start making money.

The key to survival is being strong enough to outlast your competitors.
 
Back
Top