are atp graduates of the fast track doing financially well as a cfi?

It seems like it wouldnt be such a bad guy for someone who came into it with say 500+ hours. If they did the CFI/CFII/MEI program and then instructed just for say the 6 months they should have 1000+ TT and over 300 multi. Should be set up nicely for getting on at a 121 or 135 job.
 
In short; your time as a CFi with them will be maxing out your credit cards, making friends, making enemies, and making you wonder why you chose such a terrible career.

Sorry to be negative.

You forgot about guzzling down the ATP Kool-Aid by the pint.
 
You forgot about guzzling down the ATP Kool-Aid by the pint.

Cause obviously someone has been drinking hater-aide! o_O Have you ever been in any part affiliated with ATP? Usually people that dont understand or can't comprehend just hate out of idiocy... Just sayin.. Oh and good luck with your job search with a bunch of pre-conceived notions, I'm sure you wont have a problem!
 
Out of idiocy didn't you just display your own pre-conceived notion? Why, yes you did. Yes you did.
 
Cause obviously someone has been drinking hater-aide! o_O Have you ever been in any part affiliated with ATP? Usually people that dont understand or can't comprehend just hate out of idiocy... Just sayin.. Oh and good luck with your job search with a bunch of pre-conceived notions, I'm sure you wont have a problem!


Sorry man, we are not discussing a hugely complex multi-national corporation here, we are discussing ATP. It doesnt take a rocket scientist to figure out their business model and their operating practices. The product they are selling is homogenious, it can be had from many other institutions, the end result is the same.

ATP is selling an idea, a dream really, to those who are willing to buy into their sales pitch, nothing more nothing less. To sell that dream they glam it up, just look at their(your?) website, it is filled with stories of people who went there and made it to an airline...the main image quote "ATP is proud to have the highest ratio of airline placement to student of any flight school, aviation college or flight academy." They push the "Fast Track" and "Competitive Edge" one can attain by going to ATP, hell they even have something about the future airline shortage on their homepage.

Are you telling me they are being straight up with students? Why dont they show current airline salaries, average ATP student loan payments, how long it can take you to pay back the loan, the other possibility in regards to airline hiring(the shortage has been promised for how long and never materialized?).

I don't have anything against ATP really, I just think there are more responsible ways of attaining your ratings if you plan to take a loan. I still am considering them for multi add on and CFI when I reach that point, I just couldn't justify the price for anything beyond that. School across the ramp can get me to the same place but with much more freedom, there is no way Id have a number of grass landings under my belt if I went to ATP.
 
Out of idiocy didn't you just display your own pre-conceived notion? Why, yes you did. Yes you did.

So again, you called yourself out while still trying to sound like a smart ass...

Sorry man, we are not discussing a hugely complex multi-national corporation here, we are discussing ATP. It doesnt take a rocket scientist to figure out their business model and their operating practices. The product they are selling is homogenious, it can be had from many other institutions, the end result is the same.

ATP is selling an idea, a dream really, to those who are willing to buy into their sales pitch, nothing more nothing less. To sell that dream they glam it up, just look at their(your?) website, it is filled with stories of people who went there and made it to an airline...the main image quote "ATP is proud to have the highest ratio of airline placement to student of any flight school, aviation college or flight academy." They push the "Fast Track" and "Competitive Edge" one can attain by going to ATP, hell they even have something about the future airline shortage on their homepage.

Are you telling me they are being straight up with students? Why dont they show current airline salaries, average ATP student loan payments, how long it can take you to pay back the loan, the other possibility in regards to airline hiring(the shortage has been promised for how long and never materialized?).

I don't have anything against ATP really, I just think there are more responsible ways of attaining your ratings if you plan to take a loan. I still am considering them for multi add on and CFI when I reach that point, I just couldn't justify the price for anything beyond that. School across the ramp can get me to the same place but with much more freedom, there is no way Id have a number of grass landings under my belt if I went to ATP.

I'm not saying that I don't agree with some of the business models that ATP displays, but I don't agree with what many people have to say about them, especially the kind that join the bandwagon on hating something they have no clue about. (Idiocy) It gets VERY old! But to take a couple things you said, just playing devils advocate here, but lets go with it...

So is ATP selling a dream? Isn't any successful business? And do they have the highest ratio of airline placement? Yes.. The fact is that I'm looking forward to a couple things as an instructor for them, that their business models will provide. My entire time in training, the oldest Seminole I flew was a 2007 year model with less than 1500 hrs.. Now I'm instructing with 79' models, but most of those are close to timing out. The nice thing is that the school just took delivery of the first of a new fleet of 2011 G500 Seminoles. Also, if we have any problems with any of our planes, they are either fixed or replaced within 24hrs so we can continue flying. I know of many flight schools that don't have that kind of turn around time, either due to lack of funds or planes. So their successful business plan keeps my butt in the air.

Second, while it is unfortunate that the cost of flight training is expensive, I am fortunate enough not to have taken out a loan. My roommate and co-worker did, and I can see how it affects him, but he still wouldn't change where he works. We've had that discussion. The only thing that both of us that are in agreement of, is that the training curriculum doesn't allow for enough "just enjoy flying" time. Every minute of training from master on to master off, from day 1 to day 150 is just that, training.

Third: So how many flight schools are out there saying "Pay $50,000 dollars so that you can earn $19k/yr, and be over worked and underpaid?" The way you worded that, is that its ATP's fault that the airlines pay so low! And as far as the loan, how can you put the blame on ATP for putting out there places to procure financing? So ATP must be in Sallie Mae's back pocket and getting an under the table check for pushing students towards them? If anyone, people should be upset with SM for the high interest rates!

I served in the USAF for 9 years, then 1 year FAA then 2 years contracting in Afghanistan and Iraq, all as an Air Traffic Controller, and I'll tell ya right now, that out of all three work establishments I've worked for, ATP is right on track with the same practices. You wouldn't believe how similar in my opinion, ATP's training style is similar to the way I trained controllers in the air force.
 
So is ATP selling a dream? Isn't any successful business? And do they have the highest ratio of airline placement? Yes.. The fact is that I'm looking forward to a couple things as an instructor for them, that their business models will provide. My entire time in training, the oldest Seminole I flew was a 2007 year model with less than 1500 hrs.. Now I'm instructing with 79' models, but most of those are close to timing out. The nice thing is that the school just took delivery of the first of a new fleet of 2011 G500 Seminoles. Also, if we have any problems with any of our planes, they are either fixed or replaced within 24hrs so we can continue flying. I know of many flight schools that don't have that kind of turn around time, either due to lack of funds or planes. So their successful business plan keeps my butt in the air.

No, ATP specifically is targeting people with a desire to fly a jet. They are not saying be a pilot, they say fly a JET ASAP come to ATP. They are preying on ignorance. Not saying everyone who goes there is ignorant of the reality of a flying career or of the costs, some people have good reasons for going there. But they live off the guy who comes in and says it is my dream to fly a 747 and they say, sign here and make it happen.

Is it wrong, no, they are a business trying to make money. If you dont do research then it is your (not you specifically) bad.

Second, while it is unfortunate that the cost of flight training is expensive, I am fortunate enough not to have taken out a loan. My roommate and co-worker did, and I can see how it affects him, but he still wouldn't change where he works. We've had that discussion. The only thing that both of us that are in agreement of, is that the training curriculum doesn't allow for enough "just enjoy flying" time. Every minute of training from master on to master off, from day 1 to day 150 is just that, training.

So honest question, if you were paying out of pocket, would you have picked ATP? I know personally after going through the whole application process the costs, even to finish my ratings being over 100 hours was to much to handle.Where would you be if the money was yours and not from the government from your years of service? (If money was no object I might be where you are, not questioning ATP's ability to train pilots or their commitment to quality)

Third: So how many flight schools are out there saying "Pay $50,000 dollars so that you can earn $19k/yr, and be over worked and underpaid?" The way you worded that, is that its ATP's fault that the airlines pay so low! And as far as the loan, how can you put the blame on ATP for putting out there places to procure financing? So ATP must be in Sallie Mae's back pocket and getting an under the table check for pushing students towards them? If anyone, people should be upset with SM for the high interest rates!

Not ATP's fault at all, simply saying they prey on ignorance. People who see the articles saying "airline pilots top ten highest paid job" and say well damn Ive always wanted to fly a plane and I can make lots of money and they jump in. Is it ATP's job to inform them of the reality of the profession, no, but they do go a bit overboard on making the career seem glamorous and easy to jump into.

I only have my only experiences to draw on but I know that going slower gave me time to look into the career and learn the reality. Had I already been signed up fpr a 90 day zero to hero program I wouldnt have time to look into the reality nor the option to back out at that point.


I served in the USAF for 9 years, then 1 year FAA then 2 years contracting in Afghanistan and Iraq, all as an Air Traffic Controller, and I'll tell ya right now, that out of all three work establishments I've worked for, ATP is right on track with the same practices. You wouldn't believe how similar in my opinion, ATP's training style is similar to the way I trained controllers in the air force.

I dont call into question ATP's ability to train pilots. I think for what they are they do a great job. I dont think they are doing the pilots a great service in terms of airmanship, but that is not their specialty, they get guys into the right seat of regional jets, at that nobody is better. However, I dont think that should be the focus. Airmanship is just as important as the ability to deal with CRM or program an FMS.

If given the choice between an ATP trained pilot or a guy who went part 61, spent time flying gliders to build hours, flight instructed then flew freight before gettign to an airline, Ill take the latter 99 times out of 100. In a normal flight both are completely capable of getting the plane to the destination without incident, but if things go haywire the second pilot has a much broader experience base to draw upon and the airmanship to back it up where as the ATP guy has been brought up in a fully structured environment from hour 1 without the need to think outside the box.
 
To the OP and anyone else genuinely interested in the title of this thread:

I made the mistake of listening to people on this website, and others, 4-5 years ago. Go look for some of my old threads on the subject. Bottom line for me - I did not spend much less than ATP, had far less multi, and would have been at an airline TWO YEARS earlier than I was, UNFURLOUGHED, had I made the decision to attend ATP.

Matt13C, at one time ,considered ATP for everything. He has decided that ATP is a bad choice for him. Matt cannot speak from an experienced point of view regarding ATP, as he has never had anything to do with the school. I can do both as I have trained somewhere else and then instructed at ATP. I do not believe Matt13C is doing this for alterior motives, as others have in the past; He is well intended. I am well intended, but JUST like Matt, I have my own unintended biases.

It comes down to personal choices and what is going to work FOR YOU. If you have interest in ATP, go to the school and visit. Speak with IPs, Students, and TC managers. Then, visit other flight schools. It seems like a little bit of work, but the peace of mind may be worth it for you. Just be sure to take forums such as these with a grain of salt.
 
To the OP and anyone else genuinely interested in the title of this thread:

I made the mistake of listening to people on this website, and others, 4-5 years ago. Go look for some of my old threads on the subject. Bottom line for me - I did not spend much less than ATP, had far less multi, and would have been at an airline TWO YEARS earlier than I was, UNFURLOUGHED, had I made the decision to attend ATP.

Matt13C, at one time ,considered ATP for everything. He has decided that ATP is a bad choice for him. Matt cannot speak from an experienced point of view regarding ATP, as he has never had anything to do with the school. I can do both as I have trained somewhere else and then instructed at ATP. I do not believe Matt13C is doing this for alterior motives, as others have in the past; He is well intended. I am well intended, but JUST like Matt, I have my own unintended biases.

It comes down to personal choices and what is going to work FOR YOU. If you have interest in ATP, go to the school and visit. Speak with IPs, Students, and TC managers. Then, visit other flight schools. It seems like a little bit of work, but the peace of mind may be worth it for you. Just be sure to take forums such as these with a grain of salt.

Agree with everything you said. My only intent is to give the other side of the coin.

Not going to ATP did not work out for you, as you see it. Not going to ATP or ERAU (I considered both and was days away from leaving for the latter before I found this site) worked out well for me. I am not currently a commercial pilot, I have not even finished my ratings yet, but my choices led me to where I am today. Would I like to be a pilot, absolutely and its still my goal, but I love my life currently so I can not look back on previous decisions with any degree of regret.

I still consider ATP as one of my options, if I could work out a good deal that worked financially I would jump on it. ATP is not a fly by night operation, they know what they are doing and they do it well. The FBO I went to was on the same field as an ATP location, the people there were nothing but friendly, knowledgeable and professional. Even had a former ATP guy instructing at our school for a bit, great instructor and awesome guy all around.I dont agree with some of ATP's marketing practices or how they sometimes force instructors out to make room for the guaranteed CFI people, but that is separate from the flying aspect of the school.

My goal is to just let others know options exist, financially and structure wise, as was done for me on this very site. Sometimes they work sometimes they dont, but it is totally up to you(generic you) to decide what will work best for your situation.
 
Agree with everything you said. My only intent is to give the other side of the coin.

Not going to ATP did not work out for you, as you see it. Not going to ATP or ERAU (I considered both and was days away from leaving for the latter before I found this site) worked out well for me. I am not currently a commercial pilot, I have not even finished my ratings yet, but my choices led me to where I am today. Would I like to be a pilot, absolutely and its still my goal, but I love my life currently so I can not look back on previous decisions with any degree of regret.

I still consider ATP as one of my options, if I could work out a good deal that worked financially I would jump on it. ATP is not a fly by night operation, they know what they are doing and they do it well. The FBO I went to was on the same field as an ATP location, the people there were nothing but friendly, knowledgeable and professional. Even had a former ATP guy instructing at our school for a bit, great instructor and awesome guy all around.I dont agree with some of ATP's marketing practices or how they sometimes force instructors out to make room for the guaranteed CFI people, but that is separate from the flying aspect of the school.

My goal is to just let others know options exist, financially and structure wise, as was done for me on this very site. Sometimes they work sometimes they dont, but it is totally up to you(generic you) to decide what will work best for your situation.
Very well put as well sir. Cheers!
 
So the question then is, is it worth it to do the CFI/CFII/MEI program and get the guaranteed six month contract to get a few hundred multi?
 
I have to say it's worth it. You probably won't find a better place to quickly build multi-engine time.

If someone has a goal to fly for an airline and wants to take the most efficient route possible - then I don't think there is a better place to go than ATP.
 
I have to say it's worth it. You probably won't find a better place to quickly build multi-engine time.

If someone has a goal to fly for an airline and wants to take the most efficient route possible - then I don't think there is a better place to go than ATP.
how much multi could one expect during that six months of guaranteed teaching
 
I would figure at least ~50 hours multi per month. I flew 190 hours of multi in a little over 3 and a half months at LZU. I think ~260 hours total.
 
I did the commercial multi-engine add-on 10 hr and the 15 hr MEI add-on. I already had my CFI/II and a little under 600 TT when I came to ATP.
 
In short; your time as a CFi with them will be maxing out your credit cards, making friends, making enemies, and making you wonder why you chose such a terrible career.

Sorry to be negative.

That's weird. I never used a credit card, made no enemies and actually had to get to the airlines to realize I'd chosen a horrible career.
 
God this thread is pathetic.. ATP is a business that gives guys opportunities. Those opportunities can be capitalized on by anyone. The biggest thing is, do you REALLY want to succeed and is the situation tolerable for you..

I spent four months at ATP, then instructed there for 10. Made over 2 grand a month almost every month I instructed. I left with 1050TT and got an RJ job at a favorable airline with good contract (not eagle or expressjet). I work hard and am on pace to make 35k my first year.

ATP trained me well and treated me well as an employee.. Anyone that can't make success out of their business model is just plain DOING SOMETHING WRONG.
 
God this thread is pathetic.. ATP is a business that gives guys opportunities. Those opportunities can be capitalized on by anyone. The biggest thing is, do you REALLY want to succeed and is the situation tolerable for you..

I spent four months at ATP, then instructed there for 10. Made over 2 grand a month almost every month I instructed. I left with 1050TT and got an RJ job at a favorable airline with good contract (not eagle or expressjet). I work hard and am on pace to make 35k my first year.

ATP trained me well and treated me well as an employee.. Anyone that can't make success out of their business model is just plain DOING SOMETHING WRONG.

[/thread ]
 
Back
Top